Boat Building Forum

Find advice on all aspects of building your own kayak, canoe or any lightweight boats

Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3
By:David Reekie
Date: 1/16/2008, 3:53 am

: Dave - Sharp looking kayak , the bow is gorgeous. A 16' kayak is a good
: length. I like seeing a kayak that gets the most out of its length. What
: is the max width and max chine width ?

: Have you seen the MacMillan kayak in Mark Starr's book ?

Sorry for the slow reply Tom. I haven't seen Mark Starr's book, no. The lines for my kayak were based originally on the Idglorssuit kayak lines, as digitised by Bryan Hansel (thanks Bryan).

max Beam is 21.5"
waterline beam is 19.6" at 215lb displacement (design displacement for me using it as a play boat)

Messages In This Thread

Other: To V Or Not To V
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 4:51 am
Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/11/2008, 6:14 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Bryan Hansel -- 1/18/2008, 8:56 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/19/2008, 4:49 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom. *LINK*
Bryan Hansel -- 1/19/2008, 9:30 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/20/2008, 4:47 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Kris Buttermore -- 1/22/2008, 1:28 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Bryan Hansel -- 1/20/2008, 7:07 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Bill Hamm -- 1/17/2008, 8:10 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/18/2008, 5:18 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Mike Savage -- 1/11/2008, 12:06 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/12/2008, 4:14 am
Size matters with flat bottoms
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/12/2008, 4:15 pm
part 2 of above *Pic*
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/15/2008, 1:07 am
Re: part 2 of above
John Monroe -- 1/18/2008, 5:04 am
Re: part 2 of above
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/18/2008, 6:25 pm
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
Bill Hamm -- 1/8/2008, 5:34 am
it goes deeper than a deep V *Pic*
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/7/2008, 10:42 pm
To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3+5m+
Jay Babina------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3+5m+ViUKBv -- 1/7/2008, 9:21 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3
Bill Hamm -- 1/8/2008, 5:29 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3 *LINK* *Pic*
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 9:43 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3
Tom Simpson -- 1/9/2008, 3:28 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3 *LINK* *Pic*
David Reekie -- 1/10/2008, 6:38 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3
Tom Simpson -- 1/10/2008, 10:42 pm
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3
David Reekie -- 1/16/2008, 3:53 am
V-hull or not
Jay Babina -- 1/7/2008, 10:21 am
Re: V-hull or not
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 12:18 pm
V-hull or not------WebKitFormBoundarygF0AAApM+kRZG
Jay Babina------WebKitFormBoundarygF0AAApM+kRZGKWR -- 1/7/2008, 12:29 pm
Re: V-hull or not------WebKitFormBoundarygF0AAApM+
Toni V -- 1/8/2008, 2:11 pm
Re: V-hull or not------WebKitFormBoundarygF0AAApM+
Mike Savage -- 1/8/2008, 6:46 pm
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
skiffrace -- 1/7/2008, 8:04 am
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 9:24 am
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
skiffrace -- 1/7/2008, 9:53 am
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 10:26 am
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
Toni V -- 1/8/2008, 2:05 pm
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
David Reekie -- 1/10/2008, 6:44 am