This bulletin board is sponsored by Guillemot Kayaks . Please feel free to post a response.

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Sea Kayaks Techniques Bulletin Board

Re: What is so hard!!!

Posted By: Brian Nystrom
Date: Friday, 30 July 2004, at 4:58 p.m.

In Response To: Re: What is so hard!!! (LeeG)

: Brian, as I understand the regs you have a "white light" to shine
: to avoid collision but otherwise you paddle blind/unlit OR you paddle with
: red/green running lights and a 360 white light. The first makes NO sense
: and the second eliminates the flashlight to avoid collision. Do I have it
: right yet?

No, you don't. NH inland waters are under the jurisdiction of the state, not the Coast Guard. The state requires a 360 degree white light, regardless of what the Coast Guard requires. The point I was trying to make is that different jurisdictions have different regulations. Even the CG is not consistent. When we met with them, they told us that as far as they were concerned, blue lights or those red, white or amber led bike lights that cycle back and forth were perfectly acceptable. Their primary concern is that we are visible to other boaters, not that we follow the letter of the regs. They felt that the worst case situation is that other boaters might investigate non-standard lights. Best case, they would give them a wide berth. In the case of blue lights, they laughingly indicated that other boats generally head in the opposite direction when they see them! I don't think it would be a good idea to use them in a major port, as the local CG and police might not take kindly to it.

I'm not sure if it was at that meeting or not, but I've been cautioned AGAINST using red/green lights on a kayak, as it would be likely to cause confusion among other boaters due to a kayak's small size and closeness to the water. Personally, I just do what I have to in order to meet the regs (whatever they happen to be), but I rarely paddle at night.

Messages In This Thread

Optimum running lights sought
Dan -- Wednesday, 13 December 2000, at 10:08 p.m.
Meaning of *NM*
Nick Schade -- Thursday, 14 December 2000, at 9:55 a.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Todd Bradshaw -- Thursday, 14 December 2000, at 12:32 p.m.
Re: Red Strobes
Shawn Baker -- Thursday, 14 December 2000, at 1:25 p.m.
Strobes are considered distress signals...
Jabberwocky -- Friday, 12 November 2004, at 4:43 p.m.
2000 was a good year
shawn baker -- Tuesday, 16 November 2004, at 4:18 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
risto -- Thursday, 14 December 2000, at 1:31 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Capt. M. Hamilton -- Thursday, 14 December 2000, at 6:19 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Dan -- Thursday, 14 December 2000, at 7:56 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Lee -- Thursday, 14 December 2000, at 11:12 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
M.Hamilton -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 1:32 a.m.
Funny, I thought the exact same thing
Jerry -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 11:58 a.m.
Re: Funny, I thought the exact same thing
Will -- Wednesday, 10 November 2004, at 11:11 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Don Beale -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 12:34 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
M.Hamilton -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 9:11 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Don Beale -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 1:37 a.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
M. Hamilton -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 4:00 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
MH again -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 4:06 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Don Beale -- Sunday, 17 December 2000, at 1:03 a.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
MH -- Sunday, 17 December 2000, at 10:57 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Don Beale -- Monday, 18 December 2000, at 2:22 p.m.
Red flasher not in rules = OK to use?
mike allen ---> -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 7:52 p.m.
Re: Red flasher not in rules = OK to use?
M.Hamilton -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 9:04 p.m.
Re: Red flasher not in rules = OK to use?
M.Hamilton -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 9:31 p.m.
Red flasher only on rudolph
mike allen ---> -- Monday, 18 December 2000, at 1:55 p.m.
Re: Red flasher not in rules = OK to use?
Earl Bailey -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 2:52 p.m.
Re: Red flasher not in rules = OK to use?
FBC -- Thursday, 21 December 2000, at 7:19 p.m.
lights used
tom -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 1:09 a.m.
Re: lights used
M.Hamilton -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 11:41 a.m.
High Speed Drunks *Pic*
Robert Woodard -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 5:00 p.m.
Re: High Speed Drunks
Ian Johnston -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 9:48 p.m.
Re: Thanks for locating the photo *NM*
Shawn Baker -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 9:48 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Todd Bradshaw -- Thursday, 14 December 2000, at 11:48 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
M.Hamilton -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 12:49 a.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Todd Bradshaw -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 2:09 a.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Terry -- Friday, 15 December 2000, at 7:25 p.m.
running lights thread
risto -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 8:22 a.m.
Re: running lights thread
M.Hamilton -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 12:28 p.m.
Re: running lights thread
risto -- Monday, 18 December 2000, at 3:28 a.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
David -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 9:06 a.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Will -- Wednesday, 10 November 2004, at 11:01 p.m.
Thank you, all!
Les Groby -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 12:15 p.m.
hearing
tom -- Saturday, 16 December 2000, at 7:36 p.m.
Re: hearing
Don Beale -- Sunday, 17 December 2000, at 1:11 a.m.
Re: hearing
MH -- Sunday, 17 December 2000, at 11:00 p.m.
No Strobes; link to red-green bow lights *LINK*
Mark -- Thursday, 29 July 2004, at 9:41 a.m.
Re: No Strobes; link to red-green bow lights
Tim Mattson -- Thursday, 29 July 2004, at 1:46 p.m.
Re: All round white light
Roy Morford -- Thursday, 29 July 2004, at 3:15 p.m.
What is so hard!!!
Capt. M. hamilton -- Thursday, 29 July 2004, at 8:09 p.m.
Re: What is so hard!!!
LeeG -- Thursday, 29 July 2004, at 9:45 p.m.
Re: What is so hard!!!
Brian Nystrom -- Thursday, 29 July 2004, at 10:16 p.m.
Re: What is so hard!!!
LeeG -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 3:15 p.m.
Different regs *LINK*
Kris Buttermore -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 4:47 p.m.
Re: What is so hard!!!
Brian Nystrom -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 4:58 p.m.
Coastal vs. Inland
Shawn Baker -- Monday, 2 August 2004, at 7:09 p.m.
Re: Coastal vs. Inland
Brian Nystrom -- Monday, 2 August 2004, at 7:28 p.m.
Re: I'll accept your apology later
Roy Morford -- Thursday, 29 July 2004, at 11:06 p.m.
What is so hard!--Look here...
Mark -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 9:17 a.m.
Ya'll still don't get it
M. Hamilton -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 1:34 p.m.
One problem
Karl -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 3:29 p.m.
Problem two
Karl -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 3:40 p.m.
Re: Problem two
Shawn Baker -- Monday, 2 August 2004, at 7:11 p.m.
360 white means at anchor only? WRONG!!!
Kris Buttermore -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 4:49 p.m.
Canada US differences too! Be careful with advice.
Kris Buttermore -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 4:52 p.m.
Last word from me on this
M. Hamilton -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 6:03 p.m.
Re: Last word from me on this
Brian Nystrom -- Sunday, 1 August 2004, at 9:38 a.m.
Re: Last word from me on this
Robert Woodard -- Sunday, 1 August 2004, at 10:23 a.m.
Re: Last word from me on this
mark -- Thursday, 5 August 2004, at 12:40 p.m.
Re: Last word from me on this
Shawn Baker -- Thursday, 5 August 2004, at 2:05 p.m.
Re: My Last Word
Roy Morford -- Thursday, 5 August 2004, at 4:24 p.m.
information dissemination
Karl -- Friday, 6 August 2004, at 2:55 p.m.
Re: information dissemination
Shawn Baker -- Wednesday, 11 August 2004, at 6:37 p.m.
Re: information dissemination
Karl -- Thursday, 12 August 2004, at 12:07 a.m.
Re: 360 white means at anchor only? WRONG!!!
Karl -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 9:46 p.m.
Re: Display in time
Roy Morford -- Saturday, 31 July 2004, at 1:28 a.m.
Re: Display in time
LeeG -- Saturday, 31 July 2004, at 8:18 a.m.
Re: Display in time
Karl -- Saturday, 31 July 2004, at 12:19 p.m.
Right of way
Kris Buttermore -- Sunday, 1 August 2004, at 7:29 p.m.
Re: Right of way
Karl -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 12:13 p.m.
Re: Kayakers have right of way.....
Shawn Baker -- Monday, 2 August 2004, at 7:19 p.m.
Re: Kayakers NEVER have right of way.....
Kris Buttermore -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 12:58 p.m.
Re: Kayakers NEVER have right of way.....
Shawn Baker -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 1:55 p.m.
RIGHT OF WAY can be given but not taken
Reg Lake -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 2:02 p.m.
Re: Optimum running lights sought
Robert Woodard -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 9:10 p.m.
I read the rules... and learned something *LINK*
Mike in Atlanta -- Friday, 30 July 2004, at 9:42 p.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something *LINK*
haresfur -- Monday, 2 August 2004, at 11:32 p.m.
Re: I guess that would be a headlight!!! *NM*
Roy Morford -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 1:20 a.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something *LINK*
Mike in Atlanta -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 7:59 a.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something
LeeG -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 8:37 a.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something
Ed Hopkins -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 12:31 p.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something
Shawn Baker -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 12:49 p.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something
Ed Hopkins -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 5:46 p.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something
Shawn Baker -- Wednesday, 11 August 2004, at 6:40 p.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something
haresfur -- Wednesday, 4 August 2004, at 12:18 a.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something
Karl -- Wednesday, 4 August 2004, at 12:25 p.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something
Robert Woodard -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 11:27 p.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something
Robert Woodard -- Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 11:31 p.m.
Re: I read the rules... and learned something *LINK*
Mike in Atlanta -- Wednesday, 4 August 2004, at 7:10 a.m.
Kayak lighting tests *LINK*
Kris Buttermore -- Sunday, 1 August 2004, at 7:39 p.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests *LINK*
martin lister -- Sunday, 1 August 2004, at 10:36 p.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests *LINK* *Pic*
Mike Massey -- Tuesday, 9 November 2004, at 3:05 a.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests
Tim Mattson -- Tuesday, 9 November 2004, at 3:01 p.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests - Tim is right
Roy Morford -- Tuesday, 9 November 2004, at 4:18 p.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests - Tim is right *LINK* *Pic*
Mike Massey -- Wednesday, 10 November 2004, at 4:33 a.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests - novice question
Evan Shaw -- Wednesday, 10 November 2004, at 8:47 a.m.
good question,,,consumer culture
LeeG -- Wednesday, 10 November 2004, at 11:47 a.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests *LINK*
Kelly -- Tuesday, 9 November 2004, at 3:03 p.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests *LINK*
Kris Buttermore -- Wednesday, 10 November 2004, at 10:03 a.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests
Mike Massey -- Wednesday, 10 November 2004, at 4:15 p.m.
TekTite lights *LINK*
Will -- Thursday, 11 November 2004, at 1:33 a.m.
Re: TekTite lights - call them to order
Kris Buttermore -- Friday, 12 November 2004, at 10:30 a.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests
Don Lucas -- Wednesday, 17 November 2004, at 12:13 p.m.
Re: Kayak lighting tests
Kris Buttermore -- Thursday, 18 November 2004, at 10:50 a.m.

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Sea Kayaks Techniques Bulletin Board is maintained by Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks with WebBBS 5.12.

Kayak Trips

Kayak Building

Kayaking Technique

Boat Design

 Guillemot | SEE Kayak Directory | Kayak Forum

The Kayak Forum is Sponsored By

Guillemot Kayaks

Guillemot Kayaks