Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
By:Scott Shurlow
Date: 12/27/2009, 10:16 am
Date: 12/27/2009, 10:16 am
In Response To: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking (Kudzu)
This is more a question than a suggestion but what would happen if you made the keel and stems 1.5 inches wide opposed to .75? It would have to be a stem that is a cross between a recovery and retrieval yak(over used terms created by Robert Morris, but you get the idea). Would it increase the maneuverability or just make it a pain to move through the water?
Scott
Messages In This Thread
- Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Kudzu -- 12/25/2009, 7:12 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Scott Shurlow -- 12/27/2009, 10:16 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Kudzu -- 12/27/2009, 10:40 am
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Brian Nystrom -- 12/25/2009, 9:39 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Kudzu -- 12/26/2009, 11:09 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Chuck Gandy -- 12/26/2009, 3:35 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Charlie -- 12/26/2009, 4:23 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Kudzu -- 12/27/2009, 10:39 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
brian scarborough -- 12/27/2009, 10:02 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Charlie -- 12/27/2009, 11:17 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
brian scarborough -- 12/27/2009, 7:13 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
Kudzu -- 12/27/2009, 8:17 pm
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Designing for low tracking